eagraiclainne/app

Watch

Fork 0

docs: §4h rules the three open questions and four more defects #223

Merged

nalum merged 1 commit from docs/handoff-4h-rulings into main

2026-08-26 18:34:35 +00:00

nalum commented

2026-08-24 22:06:56 +00:00

Owner

The household's rulings on what the last deploy raised, brought into the
repo where the tickets and the agents read them.

The panel ladder had no filler for a job whose sub-jobs are all ticked, and
gated the waiting panel on ownership. One table settles both: a fourth
ALL TICKED rung, and rung three drops its ownership clause, so a non-owner
watching other people's open sub-jobs gets the waiting panel back.

312px is confirmed as the shared floor — 280 predated the mandatory action row
and was dropping words out of the panel. With it comes the correction going the
other way: the panel is content-height with an 84.8px floor and never stretches,
so a one-line description cannot inflate it into a cavern. The surplus goes to a
spacer between the panel and the meta row.

Citations corrected: 2a is the ONE TO DO card, 3b the waiting card whose
spacing metrics the review quoted.

Four further defects need no ruling and are recorded with the rest.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The household's rulings on what the last deploy raised, brought into the repo where the tickets and the agents read them. The panel ladder had no filler for a job whose sub-jobs are all ticked, and gated the waiting panel on ownership. One table settles both: a fourth `ALL TICKED` rung, and rung three drops its ownership clause, so a non-owner watching other people's open sub-jobs gets the waiting panel back. 312px is confirmed as the shared floor — 280 predated the mandatory action row and was dropping words out of the panel. With it comes the correction going the other way: the panel is content-height with an 84.8px floor and never stretches, so a one-line description cannot inflate it into a cavern. The surplus goes to a spacer between the panel and the meta row. Citations corrected: `2a` is the `ONE TO DO` card, `3b` the waiting card whose spacing metrics the review quoted. Four further defects need no ruling and are recorded with the rest. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

nalum added 1 commit

2026-08-24 22:06:56 +00:00

docs: §4h rules the three open questions and four more defects

check / commits (pull_request) Successful in 14s

Details

check / go (pull_request) Successful in 2m58s

Details

check / web (pull_request) Successful in 5m1s

Details

check / report (pull_request) Successful in 3s

Details

edbc92c12a

The panel ladder had no filler for a job whose sub-jobs are all ticked,
and gated the waiting panel on ownership. Both are settled by one table:
a fourth ALL TICKED rung, and rung three loses its ownership clause, so a
non-owner watching other people's open sub-jobs gets the waiting panel
back. Every case fills, which is what made the no-unfillable-panel rule
safe to state.

312px is confirmed as the shared floor — 280 was measured before the
action row existed and was dropping words out of the panel. With it comes
the rule the build got wrong in the other direction: the panel is
content-height with an 84.8px floor and never stretches. Surplus height
goes to a spacer between the panel and the meta row, so a one-line
description cannot inflate its panel into a cavern.

Citations corrected: 2a is the ONE TO DO card, 3b is the waiting card
whose spacing metrics the review quoted.

Four further defects need no ruling and are recorded with the rest: the ⋯
stretching full width where it is a 48px square, the late meta row
splitting where it must truncate, points taking the amber that belongs to
the due half alone, and names truncating mid-word where they should drop
whole and count the rest.

nalum added the

area/jobs

label

2026-08-24 22:06:56 +00:00

forgejo-actions commented

2026-08-24 22:16:15 +00:00

Test report

Suite	Tests	Result	Skipped
Unit	1435	✅ pass	1
Integration	130	✅ pass	—

Coverage: 27.0%

_{Updated by the check workflow · commit 2aaf99ff57}

## Test report | Suite | Tests | Result | Skipped | | --- | --: | --- | --: | | Unit | 1435 | ✅ pass | 1 | | Integration | 130 | ✅ pass | — | **Coverage:** 27.0% <sub>Updated by the check workflow · commit 2aaf99ff57810ce61139ae4bcf759b469df93445</sub>

nalum force-pushed docs/handoff-4h-rulings from edbc92c12a

check / commits (pull_request) Successful in 14s

Details

check / go (pull_request) Successful in 2m58s

Details

check / web (pull_request) Successful in 5m1s

Details

check / report (pull_request) Successful in 3s

Details

to 2aaf99ff57

check / commits (pull_request) Successful in 15s

Details

check / go (pull_request) Successful in 2m58s

Details

android / build (pull_request) Failing after 5m53s

Details

check / web (pull_request) Successful in 5m39s

Details

check / report (pull_request) Successful in 4s

Details

android / report (pull_request) Successful in 3s

Details

check / commits (push) Has been cancelled

Details

check / go (push) Has been cancelled

Details

check / report (push) Has been cancelled

Details

check / web (push) Has been cancelled

Details

tag / tag (push) Has been cancelled

Details

2026-08-26 07:02:57 +00:00

Compare

forgejo-actions commented

2026-08-26 11:15:55 +00:00

Android test report

Suite	Tests	Result	Skipped
Unit (debug)		❌ 1 failed

Coverage:

_{Updated by the android workflow · commit 2aaf99ff57}

## Android test report | Suite | Tests | Result | Skipped | | --- | --: | --- | --: | | Unit (debug) | | ❌ 1 failed | | **Coverage:** <sub>Updated by the android workflow · commit 2aaf99ff57810ce61139ae4bcf759b469df93445</sub>

nalum changed target branch from test/job-card-review-goldens to main

2026-08-26 18:34:33 +00:00

nalum merged commit 2aaf99ff57 into main

2026-08-26 18:34:35 +00:00

nalum deleted branch docs/handoff-4h-rulings

2026-08-26 18:34:36 +00:00